Thursday, Dec 14th

Last update:02:10:28 PM GMT

A.I.D.S.

E-mail Print PDF

In late 1985 a respected nursing journal published a general letter I had written. It was just a short letter, but it caused a storm that has not died down to this day... and this Outline was written in 1992. What could cause such a furore? For about three years I had researched and examined ALL the medical and scientific reports published in the English language, using my local University as a resource centre. Every report was passed to me, without exception. On top of that, I also read and watched the growing number of popularised articles appearing in everything from women's magazines to prime-time television, to see what the popular perception of the disease was. Finally, I published the famed letter, which gave the results of my findings as a brief summary. I did not get to publish the Research!

At the time, I was a lecturer of post-graduate nurses and was soon to become director of post-graduate research, with a special interest in research methodology. Before I sent the letter I first obtained permission to do so from my superior - who gladly gave it, because she wanted the department to enter fully into the research arena. Why did I choose AIDS to research (before it even had a name)? When the disease was first recognised in the USA, a programme appeared on UK television (early 1980’s). As I watched and listened, I was amazed by the lack of proper methodology and the outrageous assumptions. The jumps in logic were so huge as to be unbelievable. It made me think, and my curiosity forced me to search the reports for myself. What I discovered was astounding, for my findings, based entirely on all the available data to that time, was completely at variance with the information being given out by homosexual and governmental sources! There was something wrong and so I felt compelled to publish my letter.

As the first UK Christian writer to study AIDS and to write an adverse paper, various Christian publications took notice. Afraid of the reaction, they refused to go public. One so-called 'Christian' magazine, popular with young Christians, openly condemned my work. In the same edition, it praised a gay vicar for proclaiming his homosexuality and then proceeded to extol the 'virtues' of his perversion!

So, why is AIDS so 'hot'? Perhaps the following points will suffice as a warning on the subject... The only original source of AIDS in the West is homosexuality. That is a stark fact, gleaned from official sources. Homosexuals brought it to the UK. The disease then slowly spread to others... but how? By homosexuals having sexual relations with so-called 'bi-sexuals' (who are merely homosexuals under another name), who then passed it on to females. It also spread by drug-addict homosexuals who shared needles with heterosexuals. Also, bi-sexuals who visited prostitutes passed the disease to them and the prostitutes passed it on to heterosexual males. These passed it on to heterosexual girlfriends and to wives, who then passed it on to their babies, etc. That is how AIDS came to be in the heterosexual, normal population. The hand of homosexuals in all this is clear.

If we trace the Western trend of AIDS-spread, regressively, this is how it was spread in Africa, where cases are now predominantly amongst heterosexuals. As I indicated in a later report, this predominance amongst heterosexuals is inevitable, because relatively few men and women turn to homosexuality as a sexual choice. (Note: the claimed 10% homosexuality rate in the general populace is a lie... it is nowhere near that, but closer to 1%. Also, homosexuality is a choice, not a genetic problem).

So many homosexuals have died of AIDS, they have themselves altered their lives so that they now perform so-called 'safe' sex.* For this they were proclaimed to be the 'most responsible community' in the world. Yet, they are the ones who introduced AIDS in the first place! AIDS is spread mainly by perverted sexual practices. It is also spread by infected blood and by other bodily fluids. Many lies have been told by officials and by gays; they say that we 'cannot' get AIDS by touch or by such things as tears, or saliva, or in the water of public swimming baths. The truth is far more horrendous: the actual scientific reports tell us that we are 'unlikely' to get AIDS in these ways... they do not tell us it is impossible! There is a vital difference.(* 2007 note: They have now abandoned ‘safe sex’ and so AIDS will increase again: over half of all AIDS cases are caused by homosexuals – see WHO figures. Gay leaders admit they are at fault).

We must be vigilant. If we cannot get AIDS from saliva, then why do ambulance and fire crews and police all use plastic masks for resuscitating people? Why do teachers receive instructions as to how to treat a bleeding child who has AIDS? (I have myself published such an article for teachers in The Times Educational Supplement). Though remote, it is possible to get HIV from using public baths... all it takes is for a swimmer with HIV to pass you in water which has a low chlorine level; if you have a cut or any other lesion, then the possibility is there. It has been claimed that HIV dies within minutes outside the body, but this is not true - it can live even in dried form for days and can survive ordinary cleansing procedures. Live HIV has also been found on public beaches in blood dried by the sun for days.

There are many types of HIV, too. The various viruses mutate very quickly, making a single medical solution virtually impossible. Thus AIDS will grow dramatically and fast within our lifetimes. We do not know for sure if touching a person with HIV will pass on the virus; thus when Princess Diana shook hands with so many infected gays, it was the height of stupidity. The ancient idea of isolating lepers was perfectly valid. But, today we treat HIV carriers as though they had a cold! It is the worst killer we have seen in thousands of years - it even outshines the Black Plague!

The advice is simple: do not sympathise with homosexuals who have AIDS, for they know what they do (like racing drivers who crash). Do not accept homosexuality as 'normal' - it is condemned by God. Be extremely careful when around someone with AIDS, for it could be spread by ways not yet known to medicine. Why do you think dentists wear gloves and face masks nowadays? Why do you think they must take such elaborate precautions when cleaning their equipment? It has even been known to cross over to cats.

AIDS is the result of evil. Yes, as a Christian, I see AIDS as the wrath of God in action. Yes, innocent people, including Christians, will die of the disease. But, that is the same as death itself; Adam and Eve sinned, but their individual sins led to the deaths of us all. God has given homosexuals over to their lusts and perversions and they have received their rightful reward – AIDS and other diseases. Do not be lulled into false security by official or homosexual propaganda. Several predictions I made in 1985 have already come to pass and I expect several others to do so in the future.

As for the public warnings aimed at heterosexuals and requesting them to practice 'safe sex'... this is abominable. The only 'safe sex' is within marriage and with only one opposite-sex partner! If either partner has had sexual relations with just one other person, then he or she is at risk. So, in today's promiscuous society, HIV will spread like wildfire. Another plain fact is that AIDS is still mainly the problem of homosexuals, bi-sexuals, prostitutes, drug addicts and the promiscuous. That is, people who habitually commit perversions or other public sins… though gays are still the primary source.

Thus, if a man and a woman have never done these things and they have not had sexual relations with anyone else, they may safely marry and they will not get AIDS (except by default). The spread of AIDS can be wiped out immediately, if people lived moral lives! Those who do so will not get AIDS. Therefore, AIDS is a disease of immorality. It is for this reason that gays and others hate anyone who tells the truth about the disease. They want freedom to be perverted, even if they kill in the process. That is the nature of their sin; read Romans chapter one - don't take my word for it!

© June 1992

Published on www.christiandoctrine.com

Bible Theology Ministries - PO Box 415, Swansea, SA5 8YH
Wales
United Kingdom

Please 'Make a Donation' to support the work of Bible Theology Ministries