TEN REASONS FOR REJECTING SAME SEX MARRIAGE

As to be expected Stonewall have already published a short draft of some of the amendments that they want to have, such as the removal of the term 'husband and wife' to be substituted with 'the parties to a marriage' ,  in the expected new marriage bill. As always, Stonewall are proactive and organised in bludgeoning their way through to getting what they want.  [ed. notice how the text of Stonewall's proposed amendment leaves the doors open to having more than 2 spouses in a marriage. 'The Parties' doesn't restrict the amount of people, whereas 'husband and wife' does]

To counter their propaganda, I refrain from using the word argument, because there is not one (unless you accept the whole premise that GLBTQ relationship are natural and legitimate), here are ten reasons from Dr Peter Saunders, CEO of the Christian Medical Fellowship, UK on why the definition of marriage can only be between a man and woman (particularly note point 9) :

1. Marriage is the union of one man and one woman

Throughout history in virtually all cultures and faiths throughout the world, marriage has been held to be the union of one man and one woman. Marriage existed thousands of years before our nation began and has been recognised in our laws as the 'voluntary union of one man and one woman to the exc...

The battle for the definition of Marriage begins

So the battle lines are being drawn and the final assault on the God given and natural order of marriage between a man and a woman has begun. This generation will be judged for its response to this call to action, to object and fight against this gross and obscene legislative proposal to make marriage inclusive of same sex relationships.

Will buggery be normalised or will the sanctity of marriage be affirmed?

The Coalition for Marriage (C4M) has announced their petition on line calling for every decent person (Christian or not) in the land to put their name to the endorsement of marriage between a man and a woman. This petition should have millions of signatures, but will people bother to put their name to it?

Here is the link to sign the C4M petition: