Friday, May 24th

Last update:08:59:53 PM GMT

You are here: Home

Christian Doctrine from Bible Theology Ministries

Joshua 24

E-mail Print PDF

There should not be any reason for believers to turn from God, but we do, frequently. In this final chapter we see Joshua warning the tribes of Israel, that if they turned back to the false gods they once had, or to the religion of the surrounding heathen pagans, God would be filled with wrath and destroy them. The same applies to Christians today, believers whose faith is so lax as to allow them to follow, or have sympathy with, heathen people and their beliefs. Take heed, for the Jews are still being persecuted 2000 years after Christ. And today we are being hounded and attacked not only for our faith in the Lord, but because we are sinful.

Verses 1-4

  1. And Joshua gathered all the tribes of Israel to Shechem, and called for the elders of Israel, and for their heads, and for their judges, and for their officers; and they presented themselves before God.

  2. And Joshua said unto all the people, Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, Your fathers dwelt on the other side of the flood in old time, even Terah, the father of Abraham, and the father of Nachor: and they served other gods.

  3. And I took your father Abraham from the other side of the flood, and led him throughout all the land of Canaan, and multiplied his seed, and gave him Isaac.

  4. And I gave unto Isaac Jacob and Esau: and I gave unto Esau mount Seir, to possess it; but Jacob and his children went down into Egypt.

The tribes were commanded to gather at Shechem, just north of Jerusalem, to hear what Joshua had to say. The various tribal elders and chiefs, etc., stood before him. As Joshua was dying, he might have whispered his words to a spokesman, or, God gave him strength to speak loudly. He opened by saying that what he had to talk to them about came directly from Jehovah.

He began by reminding them of their history, going back to the “other side of the flood”. That is, just after the Flood occurred. The history is very much shortened, giving just important points. The people quickly reverted to paganism, so God led Abraham out from his home, to travel through Canaan, and to have his own children who would not be corrupted by the family they left behind. From this came Isaac, who had Jacob and Esau. Esau was given Mount Seir (by the Dead Sea: Edom) by God, but Jacob travelled on to Egypt.


Are Homosexual Groomers and Those They Groom Consensual?

E-mail Print PDF

Regular readers of my ministry know that I do not avoid hard questions, nor am I afraid to make hard statements. This brief article is prompted by the unbiblical teaching of a writer (see A/854 and A/857) concerning homosexuality. In part of his stance he refers to those young people who have been groomed by unscrupulous homosexual predators, as if this precludes them from guilt. I will now ask questions and make statements as moot points, because some who have been groomed may not be part of the collusion.

Very recently, the media put out stories about the killers of ‘baby Bulger’. Psychologists were quoted – that at the age the killers struck, they did not have the intellectual capacity to understand the consequences of their actions. Yet, they also add that the two young killers understood right from wrong. Their opinions, and those of the writer in question, do not agree with scripture, reality, and God’s authoritative view on sin.

It is fact that the killers, though very young themselves, deliberately took baby Bulger to a place where they could not be seen. They looked around to determine if they were being watched. Then they committed the foul murder. The very fact that they did all this in secret and tried to avoid being watched shows a definite understanding that what they were doing was wrong. Scripturally, it does not matter if they could foretell the consequences.


Accusing a Pastor

E-mail Print PDF

Can a pastor be accused? If he is sinning, yes. However, we have to carefully define what we mean. We must define ‘pastor’; and we must define ‘accusation’ and what we mean by a response. This is needed because there are very few genuine pastors, and very few genuine accusations.

Bringing a charge against a pastor is a very serious action to take, and must be handled with extreme care. Though a pastor is equal to every other member of a local church, he is acting on behalf of the Lord and is not a whipping-post to be attacked by anyone with a grievance, even if the complaint is genuine.

One reason for this careful consideration is given in 1 Timothy 5:17

“Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour, especially they who labour in the word and doctrine.”

This is followed by verse 19:

“Against an elder receive not an accusation, but before two or three witnesses.”

Those who bring accusations, then, must do so before witnesses; accusations should not just be angrily blurted out to someone other than the pastor. To be more precise, the accuser should speak first with the pastor; only go to others if he refuses to face the charges, and, even then, the pastor must be present with the witnesses. In other words, accusations may not be made privately to others. The pastor is too important in God’s eyes to be kicked around with words, and especially words that are part of an accusation (spiritually, an accusation is the same as a charge).

Thus, making a ‘private complaint’, NOT to the pastor, but to someone else, is an act of betrayal, mere gossip, against a man chosen by God to pastor, and whose role means his life is devoted to the well-being of the flock, even when what he says might not be liked by some. Those who bring a complaint before someone else about the pastor is not showing the respect due to the pastor demanded by God. (It is assumed the pastor in question is genuinely called by God).

When a pastor is thus attacked (which is what a private complaint really is) without having the opportunity to defend himself, the complainant is unknowingly acting on behalf of Satan, the accuser of the brethren, doing his job for him. Such complaints or accusations are often false, and the net result is to hurt the pastor and to divide the local church… something that can be very hard to put right. Many genuine pastors have thus been hurt deeply, along with the local church.

Also, the one the accusation is made to (not the pastor) should rightly challenge the accuser for proof, and advise the complainant not to be so rash, when God demands a proper respect for the man who shepherds His flock on earth. To accuse such a man with no regard for his office can injure very badly.

John Calvin once said about this kind of attack against pastors: “It is a sign of a perverse and treacherous disposition to wound the good name of another, when he has no opportunity of defending himself.” The trouble arises when the accuser does not speak to the pastor face-to-face, but does so behind his back. Then, it is a form of betrayal. Personally (and probably like most true pastors), I have no problem at all with direct opposition or even accusations, UNLESS they are made without my knowledge, because such accusers are akin to hit-and-run drivers leaving the scene of an accident they has caused.


Exodus 10

E-mail Print PDF

There is much in life to bring us down, including very real enemies of the Lord. We know disease and suffering, and those with an open faith are persecuted. Yet, God is true and will not allow His people to suffer needlessly or beyond their ability to cope.

In this chapter we find Moses and Aaron repeating their challenges to Pharaoh. This ought to be our own stance. We should not just feebly quote scripture at sinners and then retreat. We must be bold and keep repeating them, plus genuine references to what happens to modern men. Otherwise we end up looking like relics, believing only in the past glories of famous preachers – a common activity for reformed Christians in particular.

We must remember that Christians have supernatural lives, even when still on this earth. This means we have the same authority and power promised at the time of Christ. Why, then, do we live like hermits, afraid to come out into the light?

Some of us experience very real suffering, and know intense trials put upon us by God. This can lead us to feel abandoned and frail, and, often, worthless. This is all to the good, for whilst we do not like the feelings, they serve a purpose. They prove that our own human emotions and frames are useless when living spiritual lives. We must learn to be strong in the Lord, not in ourselves. Then, just as the archangel dared not fight Satan himself, but relied only on God, so we will come to realise that only God gives us anything of worth. We cannot earn it, or demand it. It is given freely because He wishes to give it. Along the way He might test us so that our faith is proved. Then, when we obey and learn the lessons of the trial, we will emerge stronger than before, with deeper faith. Learn it, friends. Today it is more vital than ever.


Billy Graham – Still Apostate

E-mail Print PDF

Billy Graham stays high on the list of the most influential people in the world, but not amongst genuine Christians, who see him as an apostate. Sadly, this is how he presents himself and how most faithless pseudo-Christians see him (influential).

Billy Graham, way back in 1978, admitted that he was more Roman Catholic in thought than Christian. (McCall's, January 1978, quoted by Dave Hunt: ‘A Woman Rides the Beast’, p. 388), when he said, "I've found that my beliefs are essentially the same as those of orthodox Roman Catholics." (Repeated in ‘Billy Graham and Rome’ by Chris Pinto, 16th January 2012).

The Second Vatican Council appeared to welcome other religions, and from that time Graham became more and more ecumenical. As Chris Pinto says, once we understand that Graham is trying to fulfil the mandate of the Second Council, we will understand why he is almost completely Romanised.

Another Christian writer, Ewin Wilson, in his book, ‘The Assimilation of Evangelist Billy Graham into the Roman Catholic Church’ said:

"For some unexplainable or even mysterious reason, Billy Graham is unable to discern the theological, moral, and spiritual soul of Roman Catholicism. Likewise, he has failed to grasp, or worse still, has chosen to ignore the historical character of the entire Vatican system. Instead, he has chosen to become attracted, impressed, and finally to honor and follow the Holy See. The result has been a tragic failure on his part to understand the difference between the truth of God's Word and the utter blackness of Roman Catholicism …" (p22).


Page 1 of 18

  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  6 
  •  7 
  •  8 
  •  9 
  •  10 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »