Wednesday, Feb 21st

Last update:06:03:27 PM GMT

You are here: In the News

In the News

Termination of Pregnancy provision for women from Northern Ireland

E-mail Print PDF

Bible Theology Ministries have submitted the following response to the consultation "Termination of Pregnancy provision for women from Northern Ireland" undertakne by the Welsh Government's. 

Consultation Response:

It is pathetic that this consultation in its opening sentence and paragraph uses the phrase “Termination of Pregnancy” as a more sensitive clinical term for the legal and more explicit term abortion. Why not be straightforward on such an important matter as state authorised killing of a baby?

When a woman becomes pregnant she is having a baby, who in the natural process of time, will be born. Complications aside, the origin of the baby starts at conception. Gestation states are irrelevant as the process has already started. A fully formed baby will result if the pregnancy proceeds normally, but the process of forming is already underway from conception: everything is there.

This consultation is then asking the Welsh people to sponsor with their taxes the killing of a baby in the mother’s womb when the woman happens to live in Northern Ireland (NI).

“Come to Wales and Abort your Baby!” I am sure the Welsh Assembly Government will want to use that slogan in their 2018 promotions to encourage NI pregnant women to visit Wales.

In 2016 in England and Wales there were 190,406 abortions, that is to say a wilful decision was made to terminate the life of the baby. 

Considering there were only 696,271 live births for the same year that means for each conceived baby in England and Wales around 20% (1 baby in every 5) were aborted, which is baby-killing on an industrial scale. 

In practice, the supposedly tight legal constraints to the application of abortion are liberally interpreted so that abortion can be used as a late form of contraception. Indeed a whole industry with fancy ‘blood washing’ marketing has evolved Note that 98% of all abortions are for ‘social reasons’.

The whole abortion ‘industry’ and the euphemisms it uses to describe its practices are meant to somehow dissociate the act of killing a baby with abortion as if it not part of the process.

The spiritual consequences of abortion being carried out in our nation are just so huge – we will as a nation suffer the judgement of God for the existing baby murdering legislation, let alone extending its reach. And this does not take into account the clinical fact that psychological damage is done to most women who are aborted.

So in answer to the question for the consultation:

I totally oppose the funding in any form the killing of a baby in Wales or the rest of the UK, unless there is a medical emergency for the mother e.g. ectopic pregnancy. Mothers who abort are often later diagnosed with depression and other psychological (and/or physical) problems.

I totally oppose Wales being used as a destination of choice for the abortion of babies from NI. This objection is also on a social/economic ground as our taxes are for our use and NOT for the use of someone from an entirely different part of the country. This would allow a precedent that could include other misuse of our taxes with ever increasing devolved government.

Dr James B Waddell
'Christian Doctrine'
Bible Theology Ministries

The Trump Interview #TrumpMorgan

E-mail Print PDF

Did you watch the Donald Trump interview with Piers Morgan on Sunday 28 January 2018 on ITV??

Did you note that when asked about his Tweets quoting the Britain First group, Morgan almost demanded an ‘apology’ from Trump for doing so. Trump did so.

But, Morgan vitally missed the whole point!

When he Tweeted three quotes from Britain First he made it clear that even if the exact details were not correct, each of the three examples quoted was true in other cases... that is, they represented what Islam does everywhere.

Morgan cleverly sidestepped the real issue – Islam is a violent and untrustworthy politico-religious military movement intent on doing us deadly harm. Trump’s Tweets
were a warning to the West, even though it was not suitable to quote Britain First.

Morgan didn’t continue this fact to highlight ongoing Islamic terror in the West... he was more concerned with being trite about it, pushing it under the carpet... like trying to throw a cloth over the elephant in the room!!

Morgan insisted that ALL Britons were offended by the Tweets. That is a direct lie, a piece of propaganda. Most Britons KNOW we are coming to a crunch point with Islam. And Britain First and others like them will easily become a vigilante group when it happens.

UK citizens who are aware, KNOW Trump spoke truth and KNOW Islam is in their face and wrongly so. They KNOW Trump is saying what our own government refuses to even talk about. That is why I presently am all for Trump. He has courage of his convictions, and what he says makes sense. He is currently the only one.

Some, like leaders in Hungary, are trying to stay strong, but their membership of the EU is forcing them along a very bad leftist fascist path. And Germany and its closest friends are pushing out pro-Islam propaganda and hiding the truth so people are misled.

Until Morgan and others publicly call out Islam Trump will be made to appear to be a liar or buffoon – he is far from both.

In an interview this morning, both Morgan and the interviewers sagely pronounced against Trump’s early trouble with women. This left me angry, given that the media industry is rife with its own sexual antics. What if THEIR lives were closely scrutinised, eh? They are Pharisees whose sexual sins are kept locked away from public view! It is sickening.

I have heard many Christians repeat western propaganda against Trump and I have to grit my teeth. But, I always set them straight. Trump has been elected by God to put many things right in the USA. He won’t get it all done and he is not perfect. But, he is still in office because God has shown mercy towards the west Grasp it with both hands and stop whining. Yes, Trump might flip over into sin, but this does not mean God has not been behind some of his biggest successes or more godly actions.

He is not better and no worse than all of us!! Think you are more holy or less sinful? Hm.

Sin has degraded everything around us

E-mail Print PDF

Why do we need police?

Why do we need armies?

Why do we need doctors and nurses?


Why do we need mental health services?


Why do we need security guards?


Why does everything cost so much?


Why does homosexuality exist?


Why do people curse in the streets?


Why are pubs and clubs centres for evil?


Why, then, are we so surprised by televised wickedness, Islamic murders, and governments siding with evil?

Sin has degraded everything around us, and everything within us. And this will get worse until the last day.

Only sinners saved by grace will survive into the next life.

The majority will enter a place of torment forever.

This is why Christians must witness, not just in words, but in actions that praise God. Do you?

Ross Kemp: Extreme World: Sky 2: 18th December 2017

E-mail Print PDF

Racism in the USA rooted in Barack Obama

His programme looked at the rising racism in the USA.

But, a number of problems arose, in my view.

He appeared to begin his quest with Donald Trump’s presidency.

But, he didn’t question the part in this of Barack Obama.

Indeed, one statement he made showed a pro-Obama stance. 

True, some of the things said by the various black and white racist groups were alarming, and some were disgusting.

For someone like myself, who has followed the situation closely since before Obama illicitly took power, the programme was unbalanced and too brief to deal with the facts. 

I have no doubt both black and white groups have grievances, but, no-one has highlighted the way Obama drove a huge wedge between black and white citizens, and how he showed nothing but contempt for the police in the USA.

As a Marxist it was his aim to divide society deeply, so they rose up in anger. He has managed to do that, and Ross Kemp began at Trump instead of with Obama and socialism.

What we now see – and it was said on the programme by the various groups – is the expression of views suppressed and yet encouraged by Obama and socialism. They said that with Trump telling truth and being open, they could now do the same.

In other words, they were prevented from doing so under Obama, and the new environment has meant they can at last be open!!

What we are seeing is a natural outcome of being suppressed.

Bury people and their views and they’ll become resentful and angry. Push farther, and they’ll jump out of their corner fighting.

This has occurred throughout history! It was not caused by Trump and he is not a white supremacist, nor does he condone its ethos. All he did was remove the communistic prison door used by Obama to lock out sense, discussion and open views.

He did it simply by being open and rejecting the PC attitudes of a Marxist government. The various movements have suddenly found their voices, whether or not what they say and do is right.

People like George Soros are paying individuals to rise up in anger and to further divide society. It is why Obama did the same thing. It is typical Marxist/fascist/socialist strategy – get the people to be at each other’s throats. Wait for it to reach its height so most of society is afraid and angry. THEN come in with draconian force to bring ‘peace’. Or, in other words, socialist totalitarianism.

Kemp, then, is missing the whole picture. He sees racism, when, all along, it is about socialist meddling, destroying the fabric of society.

It has gone on for decades with politicians being paid goons of Soros, etc., just as Obama was. Obama has now done his job and become very rich. He is still peddling his socialist wares and stirring the racist pot. But, no-one points the finger at him. This is because people get used to being pushed around, to having socialist dreams foisted on them, covering up the real aims of the elite few who really run countries. If nothing else, the election of Trump and the fight against Brexit have brought to light the stinking underbelly of the beast before the world. The two issues have pulled back the curtains to reveal the actual state of the West.

Instead of voting for politicians who are true, honest and ready to serve those who vote for them, voters have elected men and women they KNOW to be corrupt, self-centred and self-serving. This has been done on the back of rampant godlessness, and so godlessness has become our flag AND life. Christians have been at the forefront of this movement, by not condemning evil, by electing corrupt men to office, and by watering down their own faith and keeping sinful men in their pulpits.

What we now see happening in Europe and the USA is but the opening of the dam of unrighteousness, a dam filled with the needs and wants of evil men and women, undealt with by those in power, because they themselves are equally unjust and evil. This could have been averted by true men of power authorised by God to rule. But, the three presidents up to and including Obama kept filling the dam with the filth of nations. In Europe, no-one stopped the fascist EU from its race to control the northern hemisphere. And no-one kicked out the UN. And that is why Brexit may be crushed – by people who want to return to their own vomit rather than begin a fresh life outside of the shackles of corrupt people and systems.

Meanwhile God is providing a penalty, including green anti-science costing us billions, the foul diseases given to us by homosexuals, and the violence of Islam. There is much more to come, but people have fallen in love with their vomit and greedily lap it up.

So, when watching programmes such as Ross Kemp’s, use your discretion and probe the background. He gets only so far, giving good facts... but fails because he doesn’t ‘join the dots’... something EVERY Christian, academic or not, should do every day. It has nothing to do with having an high intellect – it is to do with being aware and honest, seeking facts not fiction. Few attain to this, mainly because they can’t be bothered and don’t want the responsibility of knowing the truth, whether it is political, social or spiritual.

Well, the truth they hide from is soon going to batter-down their front doors!

Mosques/teaching venues Teach Extremism – some examples as proof

E-mail Print PDF

Police and government are on a wide-scale campaign to make us love our local mosque. The reason is cowardly – to help prevent further attacks by Islamists. Islam presents a confusing face to the West and try to claim that terrorists are ‘not Islamic’, even though they clearly ARE and say so! I find the government agenda dangerous and uncritical, having no real understanding of what Islam is all about. Mosques and other establishments around the world are teaching gross violence. Therefore, it is rather foolish for the UK government to assume mosques in the UK are all pure and loving. The first link below shows how ‘loving’ those teaching children are! From my many sources this behaviour exactly reflects the majority view of Muslims towards children. Not all in the business of teaching Islam are violent – but enough of them exist to be wary of.

(Note that of almost 1700 mosques in the UK, only two have amended their beliefs to suit the modern world)

Dispatches - Undercover Mosque from Ole Olsen on Vimeo.

Undercover Mosque is a documentary programme produced by the independent television company Hardcash Productions[1] for the Channel 4 series Dispatches that was first broadcast on 15 January 2007 in the UK. The documentary presents video footage gathered from 12 months of secret investigation into mosques throughout Britain. The documentary caused a furore in Britain and the world press due to the extremist content of the released footage. West Midlands Police investigated whether criminal offences had been committed by those teaching or preaching at the Mosques and other establishments. Read

Of course, the ever-PC police force try to blacken the names of any who bring attention to imams and mosques guilty of hatred.

Read article in The Mirror, Dr Simon Ross, 5th June, 2017, on the horrendous teachings in the majority of mosques (run by the Wahhabi sect) in the UK, funded by the Saudis.

Many police chiefs, however, try to teach their officers that mosques are not involved in teaching violence. To teach this to police, they must use single claims BY Muslims and ignore all the other reports! Note how this imam says UK mosques are “coming forward”... which contradicts the fact hat only TWO out of 1700 are doing so!!

Note how the men were marginalised by the mosque but not handed over to police...

This mosque may or may not have known they were terrorists, but how many are invited to speak??

Then we have a mosque that WAS terroristic. Thus to say mosques have no part in teaching terror is ludicrous and untrue!

We discovered that a site containing a vital report on madrassas that teach terror is now missing! What a surprise!

It is known that the biggest danger an undercover police agent has, is that he or she will adopt the views and actions of those they have infiltrated. This is a form of Stockholm Syndrome. This link is for interest...

The following quote is from a government paper/report... and how do we trust a government that allows and fosters Islam to do whatever it wishes? And how can we trust it when what it says is counter to investigative work by others? I am naturally very analytical and this Report does not wash with me. (The Report: Roots of violent radicalisation; Nineteenth Report of Session 2010-12. House of Commons Home Affairs Committee.

“32. Charles Farr told us that violent radicalisation in mosques or other religious institutions comprises “no more than 1% or 2%” of the total cases of radicalisation. Our witnesses tended to agree that there was very little threat from the mosques. Alyas Karmani, for example, argued that “mosques are completely disconnected from young at risk Muslims”. The Prevent Strategy states that community resistance has reduced the open operation of radical preachers and driven many to operate out of private homes or the internet. Consequently, while the Strategy cautions ongoing vigilance against potential threats, its focus on mosques is more as a tool to help in countering extremist ideology by presenting competing points of view”

Sadly, few police chiefs and others understand how to research properly or how to be critical of certain findings. They accept these Reports as if proven and beyond criticism. This is a dangerous practice. At the latter end of the report there was further lack of criticism of statements made; they were simply accepted to be true! This is the very opposite of true police work.

 Also, very few academics have studied counter-terrorism (Leiden University report: Countering Radicalisation by engaging mosques and imams: The UK’s Case’. See , which means that those who do, become the ‘experts’ used by police and government. Again, not a suitable way to examine the facts. More needs to be used – and especially those whose views are NOT government/police inspired. We only have the word of pro-Islamists who say ‘mosques are not involved’. This is NOT what a more rounded set of sources proclaim! The Report, p7, includes: “London mosques have been under increasing scrutiny since key cases such as the issue of Abu Hamza, who served as the imam of Finsbury Park Mosque, recruited for terrorism, and incited racial hatred. Suspected Al Qai’da member Kamel Bourgass and Zacarias Moussaoui who was allegedly involved in the 9/11 plot, were also known to have visited there (Dean and Allen 2006). Further to this, mosque preachers have also been made accountable for indirectly facilitating radicalisation. A reason for this is that most imams have come to the UK from abroad and do not understand Western culture; nor can they speak English. This creates inaccessibility between them and youth, pushing youth to seek answers elsewhere. Some imams have also been directly responsible for spreading radical Islamic interpretations (Bureš 2011). Many radical preachers have been prosecuted, arrested, deported, or refused entry to the UK (Home Office 2011).

The point is this – we cannot rely on the veracity of imams who claim they are not terroristic, any more than we can rely on Ian Brady to say he was not a murderer. We may only conclude that possibly some might not be terroristic and some are. To firmly say that what the imams say should be accepted as truth is a danger, and is certainly not evidence of a critical analysis. It should be remembered that just one terrorist can potentially kill hundreds, and because they ALL arise from the same ‘melting pot’ of Islam, we should be wary of all Muslims. Police do this all the time – if a youngster’s family is always in trouble with police, they naturally observe that youngster for the same traits. If they do not observe they are fools, even if nothing has yet been proved against the youngster.

 We could give many more sources that show the part taken by mosques in Britain and around the world in terror and terroristic teaching. We only have the word of mosques, who say they are not terroristic. And undercover agents who say the same may, or may not, be speaking truth (re Stockholm Syndrome). Also, times before and after their infiltration may, or may not, have been terroristic. The major fact is that worldwide Islam is pro-terror and pro-violence... why should UK Islam be different? In other words, we may never know the true extent of mosque-led/supportive terror links. Islam is about conquest and violence. To ignore this is to conduct weak and uncritical studies.

© August 2017

Published on

Bible Theology Ministries - PO Box 415, Swansea, SA5 8YH
United Kingdom

Please 'Make a Donation' to support the work of Bible Theology Ministries

Page 1 of 66

  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  6 
  •  7 
  •  8 
  •  9 
  •  10 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »