Dear Sir/Madam
I am compelled to write to the Committee on Climate Change as you have recently published your “Land Use: Policies for a Net Zero UK”, which, if implemented, will have a profound impact on agriculture in the UK and on consumer choice and consumption of agricultural products.
In fact, taken to its logical conclusion all animal life on planet earth should end; then there can be no carbon emissions. What insanity is this that is driving government policy?
The whole premise of your mission, and indeed government policy, is that climate change is driven by man-made CO2 emissions and other natural processes that create so called greenhouse gasses.
There has been no proper debate in the media, indeed it is openly reported that the BBC is systemically biased towards pushing the man-made climate change alarmist agenda – cheer led by anthropologist David Attenborough and a 16 year old Swedish school girl echoing the voice of her cultist puppet masters.
CO2 is a natural gas essential for life on this planet, that has been demonised and used as an ideological driver to completely change society and advanced anti-capitalist and green new-age religious type ideologies that are ultimately aimed at depopulating the earth and reverting back to some utopic pre-industrial existence.
There has been no proper public debate, like with Brexit, on the scientific evidence, the verity of the data, its interpretation, and assumptions, under-pinning the science and numerical models or an exposé of the ideologies and political forces behind the man-made climate change movement.
The movement is a religion, where advocates, with a so-called scientific background, are cited as authoritative prophets of truth, and deniers no matter how eminently qualified, are considered or positioned as freaks or weirdos. No debate, just accept the hot-air doctrine of man-made climate change, because these ‘learned’ institutions say so.
Government policy is meant to be developed using the core ethical values of the Civil Service: Honesty, Integrity, Impartiality and Objectivity. Yet government policy is again been driven by politically motivated ideologies and evidence is being created literally to fit the premises.
I call on you to properly open the debate on man-made Climate change and stop policies based on this new religion that does not allow criticism or scrutiny.
Yours faithfully

James B Waddell PhD, MSc, BSc (Hons)

Theresa May is going to China to take part in the climate change conference.

Both China’s leader and Obama are there, and have signed the Paris agreement.

May feels forced into signing, even though climate change is not caused by CO2!!

Why is she going to sign something based on unscientific claims?

We urge you to oppose it wherever you can, because it will cost us huge amounts in taxes, and will tie us into a global socialist deception (see my book on the global aims of the Greens). It is all part of the one world government agenda. Can’t you see it coming like a tsunami to engulf us? May should NOT sign the agreement, when she has not been given a mandate to do so!!

Most people switch off when they hear the word 'science'.

Yet science is responsible for so many ills and gains in society, from medicines to the A bomb.

And WE are irresponsible for not checking out what science says.

One does not need to be a scientist or even highly intelligent... one only needs to be aware and sceptical!

This particular science fraud is about 'global warming', which is being used to scam every one of us out of hard earned incomes through heavier taxation. This brief report shows how judges have been duped by the environmentalists (Political Outcast, 30 June 2014). The result will be massively increased costs of energy when we have ample fossil fuels under the ground. The dangers of CO2 are farcical – CO2 is NOT a poison but an essential for life itself! But Fascists and Marxists (both socialists) are using green pseudo-science to rip us off with high taxes, state interventions that overpower us, removing our freedom of choice and speech. Behind it all is hatred for God, perversions, raw power grabs, and loathing of mankind, driven by paganism. Yes, it is all 'big stuff'... but if you ignore it because of this, and because you have to think more deeply, you will never notice how many satanic movements are converging into one big World Rule. Become aware or be totally shocked when the end times rise up and smack you in the face!

An editorial signed by 16 prominent scientists in the Wall Street Journal takes sharp issue with calls for drastic action against global warming, asserting that the threat is far from "incontrovertible" as alarmists claim.

"A candidate for public office in any contemporary democracy may have to consider what, if anything, to do about 'global warming,'" the article states.

"Candidates should understand that the oft-repeated claim that nearly all scientists demand that something dramatic be done to stop global warming is not true. In fact, a large and growing number of distinguished scientists and engineers do not agree that drastic actions on global warming are needed."

Christina Elvers (a programme associate with the German Marshall Fund of the United States) advocates ignoring the scientific arguments that debunk Global Warming and just sell the message with spin and lies (propaganda). Cranks will keep on trying to make us 'green', so we must keep on opposing.

“Climate change isn't the hot topic that it used to be. But if politicians across the Atlantic are smart and re-work their narrative into stories with a positive appeal, Europeans and Americans might get excited about it once again.” (EUobserver, 26 October 2010)

© 1 November 2010

No sooner had I sent off my article on ‘Greenism’ to Canada Free Press, than I received notification that the leading scientific institution, the Royal Society, has backed down on its strident global warming claims! To put it frankly, that is one in the eye for the silly young geology graduate who decided to back the green horse in the MENSA journal (who prompted my article: ‘Greenism’).

Of course, someone like the Royal Society would not come outright and admit to its failure over global warming claims, because that wouldn’t be cool. Instead, it says that it is rewriting its guide to climate change, to show that there is “greater uncertainty about future temperature increases than it had suggested.” (The Times, 30^th Sept 2010 Royal Society bows to climate change sceptics). I don’t really care about the language, because everyone knows it is a climb-down.

In Canada Free Press I give many examples, in a variety of articles, of the myriad falsities inherent in the green movement. Sometimes, falsity can be accepted as a side-effect of stupidity, but not in this case. The green movement is the province of intelligent middle classes. So, why is it that these people come out with such nonsense? It’s because their intellect doesn’t match their intelligence, making them accept emotionalism rather than truth. In other words, they are prejudiced against reality.

One of the most recent pro-green articles by foolish people was, to my surprise, in MENSA magazine (October 2010), written by a newly-degreed fellow reading geology. Way back over 40 years ago I thought of joining MENSA, but then, as today, I cannot think of a benefit. And, now I have read the article, I can see that intelligence is no defence against propaganda and fakery. The article itself is not worthy of inclusion in a journal for people with high intelligence… it is just a collection of the usual propaganda, all hot air and no reason. I do not doubt the author’s intelligence, only his ignorance riding on the back of vanity.

Unnamed glacier with peak 5977 in background. Ngozumpa valley, Everest region, Himalayas, Nepal. Photo taken on: April 11th, 2009. © Alexander Zotov | Dreamstime.com

One of the key statements in the infamous 2007 IPCC Report, was that the Himalayan glaciers would all melt away by 2035, “if the earth keeps warming at the current rate”. As the current rate is negligible, it is like trying to melt iron ore with a candle held at arm’s length.

The IPCC said the claim was based on a WWF study, and that the likelihood of the glaciers melting was “very high” – in other words “90% probable”!

The Report claimed that the glaciers were receding faster than in any other part of the world.

Here’s the truth – it was nothing but hot air!

Climate change background made of magazine clippings. Photo taken on: January 13th, 2010 © Brad Calkins | Dreamstime.com

It happens all the time – when big groups decide something is so, they will keep up the pretence no matter how wrong they are. This is especially true of greens. The whole scam MUST be kept going, because greens don’t want to admit they are fraudulent, and don’t want others to think they are liars.

Boating in the Amazon jungle. Photo taken on: August 14th, 2009. © Paulo Carvalho | Dreamstime.com

Just a few weeks ago it was proved that the IPCC lied about Himalayan glaciers. Now we have lies about Amazonian rainforests! Or, as the title in a Cornwall Alliance report (29^th January) says: “Another Bogus Claim by IPCC”.

We want these facts to keep on coming… and, if possible, be even bigger, so that the IPCC sinks without trace (which is more than can be said for the islands in the Pacific supposedly sinking below extraordinary sea levels! The sea level rises created by IPCC personnel fraudulently moving decimal points).

The Claim

The 2007 IPCC Report said that up to 40% of the Amazonian forests could (note the unscientific ‘could’) react drastically even if any change were very small, such as less rain. That was a very big claim to make… but it came back to bite them. It never rains but it pours, eh?